I'm surprised that this part of the code was shared by the desktop and lv2 versions, yet it problem only appeared in lv2. Programming is for the brave; you never know what's going to go wrong or why...
On the other hand, I had a pleasant surprise.
Apparently, because it's compiled, it adopts the QSS Tecnico style. I think it looks good, although some things need correcting. I suppose if the Tecnico style is expanded to include the Vee One Suite class names, everything would look correct, but that's a task I don't plan to undertake.
I'm surprised that this part of the code was shared by the desktop and lv2 versions, yet it problem only appeared in lv2. Programming is for the brave; you never know what's going to go wrong or why...
On the other hand, I had a pleasant surprise.
Apparently, because it's compiled, it adopts the QSS Tecnico style. I think it looks good, although some things need correcting. I suppose if the Tecnico style is expanded to include the Vee One Suite class names, everything would look correct, but that's a task I don't plan to undertake.
Thanks!!